All About Eve


There are many false and destructive teachings about Genesis 3 and the Garden of Eden,
loosely called, "Serpent Seed". Now in light of new medical knowledge, it is time to revisit
Gen:3 and separate truth from error.
Genesis Three, and what happened between Adam, Eve, the "forbidden fruit" and the devil
has been a mystery for almost 3500 years. Now, it is time to shed some new light upon this
ancient story.
The following theory is based upon two factors:

1) that Satan had the ability to have sex and reproduce and
2) that the "forbidden fruit" was human sexuality.

"And Eve, tempted by the serpent
ate of the fruit from the tree of
knowledge and her eyes
were opened."
"And after that, Eve gave
the fruit unto Adam and he
too ate of the fruit from
the tree of knowledge."

There is zero mention of Adam and Eve having sex (i.e.
"knowing") and children before
they ate from the Tree of Knowledge (of good and evil) despite the fact they lived in a
paradise and both were naked. In fact, they both seemed to have a childlike in innocence
when it came to human sexuality.
These factors seem to indicate the "forbidden fruit" and its knowledge of "good and evil" is
human sexuality. So often Sex is used for evil, from Prostitution, Adultery, Abortion and
satanic ritual to selling toothpaste and teddybears to the $20 billion dollar a year porn
industry. Great evil comes from the misuse of this "knowing".

So The Serpent (satan) successfully tempts Eve to "eat the forbidden fruit" and everything
changed forever as innocence was lost.
"And Adam and Eve heard the
Voice of The Lord and they were
ashamed and covered themselves
with fig leaves."

The shame of Adam and Eve clearly shows a
new "knowledge" and awareness of
sexuality and their own nakedness. Now let's look at what happened next.
"And the Lord said unto the
woman, "You shall have pain
in childbirth and your desire
shall be towards your husband."

The Punishment upon Eve (womanhood) was pain in childbirth. This seems directly linked
to sexual intercourse and pregnancy. Also her "desire" is to bear her husband's children
yet have to endure this great suffering to do so. This "curse" provides more proof that
"eating the forbidden fruit" does represent SEX.

Soon after their "eating of the fruit", Adam and Eve were banned from the tree of life (that
prevents aging leading to death). Now look what happened next.

"And Adam
knew his wife and
she conceived and a son was
born whom she named, Cain."

Adam and Eve had sexual intercourse
("knowing") and Eve conceived and gave birth to
a son whom she named CAIN. It seems clear that when Eve and then Adam ate of the
"forbidden fruit", this activated their human sexuality.
Possibly their human "self consciousness" was fully awakened, adding sexuality to
selfishness. Now let's see what happened next in Gen:4.
Eve again bore a second
son and named him ABEL".

There is no record in Gen:4 that "again, Adam knew his wife and she conceived
and bore a second son, Abel.

Gen:4 states that "Eve again bore a son and named him Abel".
It seems clear that Eve had twins, Cain the first born and Abel the second born. This
brings us to a modern day medical discovery.
In recent years, the medical world discovered a reproductive phenomenon known as
"TWINNING". This is when a woman can become pregnant with twins that come from two
separate fathers.
This rare occurance would happen if a woman has sexual intercourse and is impregnated
by MALE #1, then 1-4 days later she has sexual intercourse with MALE #2 and conceives
a second child in her womb.

It is very possible that Satan (the serpent) tempted Eve to eat the forbidden fruit for his
own agenda. Once Eve became sexually active, Satan had sex with Eve and she became
pregnant with Cain. The Serpent (satan) could create a "new" race of humans, in
his own
twisted "image and likeness",
an army of his children to make war with God's people.

After Eve became impregnated by Satan, she gave Adam the "fruit and he ate it. Adam
became sexually "turned on", had sexual intercourse with Eve and she became pregnant
with Abel. Now Eve had twins growing within her womb, TWINNING, the first fathered by
Satan (Cain) and the second fathered by Adam (Abel) 1-4 days later.

Once again, Eve's Punishment was pain in childbirth. This does seem to be the
of Eve
1) eating the forbidden fruit,
2) having Sex with Satan and
3) becoming pregnant with his "seed", his unholy offspring.

We read in Gen:4 that Cain, in a jealous rage, killed his brother, Abel. When The Lord
questioned Cain as to the whereabouts of his brother, Cain said, " Am I my brother's
keeper?" (how should I know?)
So here we see Cain committing both murder and lying about it. In The Gospel, Jesus
called Satan,
"A murderer, a liar and the father of all lies."
Like father like son? It does seem as though Cain was following in the footsteps of "His
Father", a psychopathic "Archangel". If true, this does make the devil's sins with Eve all the
more sickening and evil.
As a result of Cain's sins, YHWH GOD banned him from the garden of Eden. Cain traveled
to the land of Nod where he took a wife and created his own family tree.
It is interesting that Cain and his lineage is not mentioned in Genesis after the seventh
generation. Yet Noah and the Flood happened in the tenth generation.
It seems that Cain's line was ended, probably by violence, 120 years before Noah was
called to build his ark. Also, it was only Noah, his wife, their three sons and their three
wives (distant cousins) who entered into the ark, survived The Flood and later repopulated
the human race. (everyone else was drowned in the deluge).
So even if Cain was a "hybrid", born of Satan and Eve, he and his children were destroyed
at The FLOOD never to see the light of God's day again. Everyone born after the flood is
100 percent HUMAN.

According to Nazi/Satanic Theology, Eve did have sex with the "Serpent", the devil, and
gave birth to Cain. This teaching then twists the Bible, just as a swastika twists the cross as
it says Cain's Line survived the Great Flood and the Jews and the blacks are the children
of Satan, "serpent seed".
Hitler believed that when he "cleansed" the earth of the "serpent seed", the Aryan super
gods would return to earth, set up the Golden Age of Mankind and anoint Hitler as "king of
the world".
This dark doctrine was not only the motivation for the Holocaust, it will again be the catalyst
for Antichrist to lead a Second Holocaust against Christians. (Rev:13). Ultimately, The
Beast will teach that all who reject 666 have tainted, corrupted DNA, "Serpent Seed" and
must be eliminated to purify the human race."

In the book, "JUNE 6 2006, (666) ANTICHRIST REVEALED" there is a deeper study of
"serpent seed" and the possibility that Cain himself could return as The Antichrist. (the
world's first murderer to lead a Second Holocaust). I suggest this book for those who seek
an in depth study of Antichrist and this dark mystery.
Whatever happened in Genesis:3, Satan will repeat this scenario on a global scale
(Revelation) when he deceives the world with his two most ancient lies:
1) "You shall not die" (Reincarnation) and
2) "You shall be as gods" (Spiritual Evolution).
The most important aspect and focus as to Bible Prophecy and The End Times is there
are TWO RAPTURES (not one) and we can ESCAPE 666 in the first event, by following
JESUS in Spirit and in Truth." (Lu:21:34-36 = Rev:3:10).
Charles Crosby

Did Eve Have Sex With the Devil Or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
The literal eating of a particular fruit from a particular tree, albeit forbidden by The Lord, can be considered
that evil, that wicked, that Adam and Eve should lose their opportunity of a continued physical life in paradise
in The Garden and, with it, access to the Tree of Life and Eternal Life?

If a child in our care were to not follow our instruction for the first time would we lash out with a severe
punishment at their first mistake? Obviously not, so why did The Lord punish our original parents so severely
for eating the wrong kind of 'apple'? Does the punishment fit the crime?
Adam and Eve's sin was so serious, so heinous, that The Lord had no option but to severely punish and
banish our original parents from The Garden.
This then leaves us with the question of what kind of wickedness or sin(s) could it have been that would
warrant such a severe punishment?

Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it
shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

This verse is most important in that it influences the whole of this study, for it
mentions two seeds. Now
what are these two "seeds", because before we move on we must be clear in our minds what they represent
and, of course, it's very straight forward. Most readers will know what the Biblical word 'seed' means, in this
context, but to make sure let's use another example or two so that there is no ambiguity or confusion:
Genesis 9:8-9 And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying, 9 And I, behold, I establish my
covenant with you, and with your seed after you.
Genesis 15:3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is
mine heir.
Strong's Hebrew Ref: H2233 seed = zera or zeh'-rah
From H2232; seed; figuratively fruit, plant, sowing time, posterity: - X carnally, child, fruitful, seed
(-time), sowing-time.
So as we can plainly see, the word 'seed' refers to offspring and if we refer to Strong's Concordance for
further evidence we will find that the Hebrew word for 'seed' in Genesis 3:15 is the very same as in Genesis
9:9 and 15:3. OK, so if we go back to Genesis 3:15 we can see that the Lord is going to put enmity between
these two very different seeds or lines, but who is the Lord speaking to? Let's go there now:
Genesis 3:14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed
above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all
the days of thy life:
There we have it; the Lord is speaking to the Devil, Satan, that serpent and arch-deceiver also known as the
destroyer, the adversary and in this instance the arch-seducer, for, without doubt,
one of the two seeds
mentioned here is his seed.

Notice, too, the phrase "because thou hast done this". From that we can easily deduce and know
that Satan actually did something and the term 'doing something', more often than not, refers to a
physical action, not just an 'action' of sitting idly by on the sidelines enticing, goading or
provoking as an exuberant spectator.
So what does all this mean, for we are very definitely dealing with a physical seed that belongs to the Devil?
In turn, this now beggars the question, how can a spirit being have physical sexual relations with a woman?
Well, the only verse in the Holy Scriptures we can rely on or turn to for any evidence to this event is in
Genesis once more:
Genesis 6:1-2 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters
were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took
them wives of all which they chose.
Who were these "sons of God" here that took the descendants or daughters of Adam for wives? Well they
can only be one thing, they were fallen angels or angels that went astray and left their first estate as
described in Jude 6
Jude 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in
everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
The important words of this verse are 'kept not', 'first estate' and 'habitation'.
The words 'kept not' mean they failed to keep a guard or failed to hold as precious their Spiritual inheritance
or estate, i.e. to maintain any value upon their Spiritual substance and the honor bestowed upon them as
Spirit beings.
Instead they took it upon themselves to choose the lower order of the physical or
the base level of physical men.
This means they despised their inheritance or first estate and placed
more value upon human fleshy desires and,
don't forget, these daughters were women in the fallen
condition - they were not saved.
These angels treated with contempt their manifestly higher order that The Lord had blessed them with, i.e.
their 'first estate' - their high position. Not only that, they gave up their home as well or their superior
habitation; very reckless and foolish indeed. So much so, it ultimately cost them their freedom because the
Lord incarcerated them in darkness, where they are to this day and where they will remain until the Last
Great Day at the end of the Millennium or the end of The Lord's one thousand year reign on this earth as
King of kings.
Now this brings us to an important issue. This wickedness was not a one off, this had all happened before,
and it was a follow on from the earlier wickedness of their leader, Satan the Devil, otherwise known as
Sammael in the other writings I mentioned earlier. He set the example in The Garden and these fallen
angels followed in his footsteps, and their actions were a repeat of his wickedness.
So what was this wickedness? Quite simply, it was the seduction of Eve. We can then add in the cuckolding
of Adam or possibly even the sodomizing of Adam - we do not know all the details. What we do know,
though, is that the Devil contaminated their Godly union, which up until that point had not been
Adam and Eve discovered the sexual act through perversion and through lust and nothing but lust. This
event was a compounding event, because after the Devil had had his evil way with Eve he then, through
Eve, encouraged Adam to take her afterwards (he ate of the fruit too) thereby reducing her to the status of a
sexual object, an adulteress or possibly worse, a promiscuous slut or unpaid whore. This, in effect, was the
first pornographic act - the first threesome; the use of the woman's body for nothing but selfish sexual
There was no love in this event, and
it was the first sexual act on earth between a man and a woman,
but only after she had been defiled by another.
This, too, is how they knew they were naked and covered themselves with leaves and why, too, they hid from
The Lord in The Garden. They covered their sexual regions, they were laden with shame and guilt - they felt
dirty and contaminated. Furthermore, it was this act that gave them the knowledge of good and evil, not
through the literal eating of an 'apple', the fruit is pure symbolism.
Not only that, if we think the literal eating of fruit from the wrong tree can make us feel dirty, unclean and
shameful what kind of fruit could that be. OK, we could and would feel guilty for having not followed The
Lord's instructions, but not dirty and ashamed.
No, there is only one act that could have had that kind of effect on a previously innocent man and woman
and that act is the promiscuous, lustful, loveless, perverted sexual act.
OK, so we now have the evidence that shows this wicked event took place, but where does this lead us?
Quite simply, back to the two seeds, the two seeds that produced two offspring - Cain and Abel.
One child was of the Devil's seed and the other was of Adam's seed.
Gen 4:1-2 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man
from the LORD. 2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a
tiller of the ground.
Now, based upon the evidence that I have revealed from the Holy Scriptures, Genesis 4:1 seems to read like
a complete contradiction of the previous verses. We know there are to be two seeds, but this verse looks as
if it's saying that Cain is Adam's son and Abel is Adam's son too, and not only that, but that Cain was a gift to
Eve from The Lord himself no less.
Now where have the two seeds gone, because if Cain and Abel are both Adam's sons then they can only be
of the one seed, for they are both of Adam's seed, so what's going on in this verse?
Well we know don't we, the true evidence has been written out of the narrative by the translators. Now
there's a surprise, and why would they do that!? They would do it because it would mean that they would
have to admit that
there are certain beings we live with on this earth that are of a specific demonic
race. It would also mean their having to admit what I have stated above, that Eve had sex with
Devil and produced this race via Cain from that evil illegitimate union.
The thing is, who are these
beings and how do we identify them?

Cain and Abel

Gen 4:1-2
And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man
from the LORD. 2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a
tiller of the ground.
"And Adam knew Eve, his wife," hello, excuse me, Adam did what? Adam had already 'known' his wife in The
Garden, so how is it that after expulsion from The Garden he is only now 'knowing' his wife as if for the first
time? And what has happened to the two seeds if Adam is the father of both Cain and Abel?
Notice, it
doesn't say "And Adam knew Eve his wife again".
Then it says she conceived and bare Cain and not only that but she says she has: "Gotten a man from the
Lord". We then have Eve conceiving and baring Abel, but with Adam having only known her once, so what's
going on here!!?? We need to understand that Eve fell pregnant due to sinful, evil, promiscuous and
lascivious sexual acts and then declares
she has been blessed with a man from the Lord. How does
that work then, does the Lord bless sin?
We only have to recall what happened to King David's child
through his illicit sexual shenanigans with Bathsheba to know that The Lord does not bless the fruits of the
womb of Biblical characters when they misbehave. You can read the story in 2 Samuel 12 and in particular
verse 15.
Make no mistake Eve's evil union with the Devil would, and could, only bring trouble, not only to her, but to
Adam, and for all mankind in the future as well, culminating in the flood and the sinful post flood world, too
i.e. our world today. If we know the story, we will also know that the fruits of this event would be graphically
displayed in the way in which Cain turns out i.e.
what kind of a being he was - a human being - NOT A
MAN; Cain was the first human being.
As an aside, 'Hu' from the Hebrew/Gaelic tongue means 'serpent' so a hu-man is a serpent-man - a
descendant of Cain. A man therefore is NOT a hu-man being and a hu-man being is NOT a man.
This is why Yashua Anointed was known as The Son of Man - a Son of Adam.

Moreover, and that being the case, what was Eve really saying when she said she had: "Gotten a man from
the Lord?" This KJV corrupted evidence also raises another question, how did Eve come to the conclusion
that Cain was a gift from The Lord.
We know that Adam and Eve's sin in The Garden was sexual in
nature, because they covered sexual regions with aprons to hide their shame. This means that
Eve must have had a good idea of whose child she was carrying in her womb.
That being the case,
how did she come to the conclusion that it was a gift from the Lord? How does that make any sense?
Furthermore, how did the translators of the KJV think they were going to get away with this stupid nonsense -
the nonsense of Eve's statement that: "she had gotten a man from the Lord"? Was it a case that they
thought she was completely naïve, I don't think so, because all they wanted to do was hide the truth that
Cain was literally a son of the Devil. Why did they want to do that and what did they have to gain from such
devious behaviour?  We then have to ask ourselves if Cain and Abel were twins, for it appears that
'knows' Eve once only.
So if Eve did have twins, could these twins have had different fathers - a phenomenon known in medical
terms today as
superfetation? Well, it has been known, and more often than we might at first think. A little
Google search will soon reveal and confirm to you this not so uncommon anatomical phenomenon.
Therefore, Cain and Abel could have been twins with the Devil as Cain's father, and Adam as Abel's father.
The thing is, twins or not, it's the two seeds or seed lines that matter here, nothing else, for this is the core of
the matter.
1 John 3:12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him?
Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous.
Notice in this verse of John's letter we have Cain who was
"of that wicked one". The word 'of' here in
Strong's Concordance means 'origin', so Cain's "origins" are of the Devil which, again, points to
him being the Devil's seed.
More evidence, too, is made plain through the genealogy of Adam in Genesis 5. Notice, you will
not find Cain's name mentioned in that genealogy, why is that? Well, quite obviously, because
Cain was not Adam's child.
Gen 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image;
and called his name Seth.
Now why did Moses write this verse like that? Why, to draw to our attention the fact that Seth was made in
Adam's own likeness, after his own image, and why make special reference to that? What other image could
Eve have born in her womb, if it was not in Adam's image and in his likeness!!?? Well obviously, this verse is
telling us without actually saying it, that of the two sons Cain and Abel, Abel now deceased, only one of them
was in Adam's image and in his likeness - Abel. Elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures it tells us that Seth is a child
born to Adam and Eve to take Abel's place:
Gen 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she,
hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.
So this means that from Adam we have Abel (murdered) and then Seth who begat Enos, who begat Cainan,
who begat Mahalaleel, who begat Jared, who begat Enoch, who begat Methuselah, who begat Lamech
who begat Noah.
So there we have it, the Sethitic line from Adam to Noah.
Right, I will now copy here what it says in documents known as the Aramaic Targum(s). Those of you not
familiar with these writings, the Aramaic Targums are ancient Jewish writings dating from around the time of
the Jews captivity in Babylon, so this means they date from around 550 BC. In general these writings are
blasphemous in their content and I would not recommend them to Christian brothers and sisters at all.
Having said that we cannot conclude that everything written therein is error for Truth can be found in the
most unlikely of places e.g. the caves where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found. OK, so here is the writing:
And Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the angel (of death) and she
became pregnant and bore Cain. And she said: "I have got a man from the angel of the LORD."
Now here we can plainly see this verse has a completely different narrative altogether and tells us a very
different story from the corrupted meaningless nonsense in the KJV. It also begins to make some sense. We
know that the Devil was always going to try and thwart The Lord's plans for his pinnacle of creation -
mankind. We are, after all, made in Their Image and what better way to thwart that plan than by literally
polluting The Godhead's creation by intercourse with His creation, Eve. Notice how Eve's statement has
changed and the naïvety of her KJV statement revealed for what it is - the work of evil dissemblers via their
agenda based translations.
Returning once more to the KJV, notice, too, how Eve is known as the "Mother of All Living" but
Adam is not known as the 'father of all living':
Gen 3:20
And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.
The word 'was' here should more accurately be translated 'was to become' and of course she did become
the mother of all living, but Adam is nowhere known as the 'father of all living'.
This, once again, tells us
that Eve sired children from another source other than Adam, and, of course, that source was
The Devil.
If we now return to Genesis 4:1-2 we can then see that after Eve conceived Cain she then bare Abel, but it
doesn't say how long the interval between the two conceptions was, so as I said earlier some commentators
say Cain and Abel were twins, others that Abel followed swiftly nine months later. Either way they were of a
similar age and grew up together, one, Abel, being a keeper of sheep and the other, Cain, a tiller of the
The story then continues with Cain's infamous wicked act of murdering his half-brother, but what was behind
this act?

The Mark of Cain

Continuing straight on from part two, what was behind Cain's murderous act, what was his motive? Most
people believe it was just the evil act of a jealous brother whose offering to The Lord was not acceptable, but
what made it unacceptable? Was it just because it was not an animal that made it unacceptable or was there
something else, and was the unsatisfactory offering of Cain symbolic of a deeper malaise within Cain, for we
must not forget who his physical father was.
OK, we know, too, that there was an argument between the two half-brothers but what was the argument
Gen 4:8 (KJV) And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that
Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
Cain and Abel were arguing ferociously, but what about? Well, we have a good idea, because it was the
subject of sacrifices or religious observances i.e. those that were acceptable to The Lord and those that
were not.
So what was unacceptable about Cain's offering? Quite simply, it contained no blood, and it was one made
partially with his hands. He had to plant the crops he offered, as opposed to Abel's which was made totally
without his hands and by God.
Yashua Anointed is the Stone or Rock (please note, all you Roman
Catholics) hewn without hands.
Cain's offering was a tarnished offering, an insulting offering, and Abel's was unspotted and perfect, a lamb
of the firstlings of his flock, a type of the Passover Lamb with its shed blood that soaked into the ground.
There was something else, too, within this rebellion of Cain, for it was not just spiritual. The spiritual
dimension to all this was only the half of it, for be aware, the rebellious physical descendants of Cain are still
with us today, as is his name. But how can a spirit, six thousand years old, have influence over us today, I
hear you say? Again, quite simply, because it was the
spirit of the Devil alive in Cain and a spirit would
be carried over and through The Flood through Ham and his sinful shenanigans.

Cain wanted to rule the roost in both areas of influence and stamp his authority on everything. All politics
and religion - THE SYSTEM, THE MATRIX or THIS AGE or what the Holy Scriptures call THIS WORLD - the
Old New World Order started here with Cain, and there was no way he was going to allow his upstart son of
man half brother to have any authority over him.
Cain, don't forget, was a demonic hybrid - a half
heavenly serpent being and half manly being - a 'hu-man' being, so no doubt considered himself
far superior to his earthly, fully man, half brother.
Furthermore, 'hu' from the Hebrew/Gaelic tongue means 'serpent' so a 'hu-man' is a 'serpent-man'
and NOT a man. Mankind and humankind are two very different species.
Moreover, this spirit was Satan's spirit, imparted to Cain by his father The Devil. Satan the Devil knew God's
plan would eventually mean men resurrected to Spirit status, a status that would give resurrected Spiritual
men authority over him and his followers in the future. The Holy Scriptures bears this out when
Paul said to
the Corinthians:
1 Cor 6:3 (KJV)
Know ye not that we shall judge angels? How much more things that pertain to this life?
Satan, therefore, was going to do all in his power to stop mankind attaining his ultimate prize - life eternal
with authority over angels, for us as resurrected Spiritual beings in the Kingdom of God. His evil plan to
thwart the progress of mankind, therefore, began with the murder of Abel through his son Cain and with this
evil act came the infamous Mark of Cain:
Genesis 4:15 (KJV) And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be
taken on him sevenfold. And The LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

The question that now needs answering is WHY!!?? Why did The Lord spare Cain, for without any doubt it
was a let off, if only a temporary let off. Under The Law (for The Law in Spirit was in force before Moses) of
the Old Covenant he should have been slain immediately and in the same way as he had slain his brother -
an eye for an eye etc.. So why did Yashua Anointed let him off? For the simple reason that everything is to
God's Glory and His Glory being ultimately served through His plan for mankind, which Satan was never
going to stop - try as he will. In order to comprehend God's ways, we must understand this fundamental of
fundamentals. All the events in the narrative of the OT had to come to pass, in order to bring us to and
necessitate Yashua Anointed's birth into this world and then His sacrifice and His resurrection. This 'Mark'
that Cain received is one and the same as the Mark of the Beast in Revelation.
We must also remember, as well, that our ways are not God's ways; our logic and reasoning are not God's
logic and reasoning. Our ideas of logic and reasoning are based solely upon our puffed up "we think we
know what's best" vanity and pride, unless of course, we are Born of God (Born Again) and have a close
brotherly relationship with Yashua Anointed who then teaches us His ways and His logic.

Cain's ways are not Yashua Anointed's ways, for Yashua Anointed is The Way. Cain's ways involve
philosophy and the intellect which man has emulated to his downfall. This means man's pride and vanity,
through his reliance on his own logic and reasoning, has created nothing but blasphemous error when it
comes to matters Scriptural and Spiritual. In turn, this mindset, a mindset of philosophical intellectual
reasoning has separated man from his Creator.
A good example of this phenomena was a Canaanite Jew by the name of Philo who operated out of
Alexandria in Egypt in the first century AD, from whence we get the word 'philosophy'. He groomed and
'educated' the counterfeiting 'church fathers', so called, who then infiltrated the first century church in order
to corrupt it and then go off in order to start their religion.
This Philo being a Canaanite Jew made him a
descendant of Cain.

Getting back to the story line we then have God punishing Cain for Abel's murder, but with a punishment
Cain cannot bear. How is it a punishment he cannot bear? He cannot bear it because man's environment
was to be cursed by God a second time. Man lost the beautiful environment of the Garden of Eden through
Adam and Eve's sin and he was about to loose the fertility of the earth as a whole. The Lord was going to
curse the earth totally so that it would no longer yield any crops at all and all men would know that Cain was
to blame for it and would therefore seek him out to kill him:
Gen 4:12 (KJV) When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive
and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.
There we have it, Cain as fugitive on the run from his half-brother mankind for the rest of his days and, as a
poverty stricken vagabond at that. Unsurprisingly, this was more than he could bear. So Cain pleads for
mercy and The Lord hears him:
Gen 4:13-15 (KJV) And Cain said unto The LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear. 14 Behold,
thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a
fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
15 And The LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him
sevenfold. And The LORD set a Mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
Again, there we have it and with Cain admitting that his face will be hid from The Lord and his life not worth a
dime. So The Lord puts a Mark on Cain protecting him from his half-brother mankind lest any should attempt
to kill him.
Now this is all very interesting I hear you say, but if we have modern descendants of Cain still with us today,
do they still carry the same mark? Yes, of course they do. How do we know that? Easy, they get away with
blue murder and never get apprehended.
Finally, we then have Cain's genealogy from Enoch:
Gen 4:18-22 (KJV) And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat
Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech. 19 And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was
Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. 20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in  tents,
and of such as have cattle. 21 And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the
harp and organ. 22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubal-Cain, an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron:
and the sister of Tubal-Cain was Naamah.
Now this Naamah is reputed to have been Noah's wife,
but the Holy Scriptures again go stone cold on
this topic, for Mrs Noah is never referred to by name. However, she is mentioned in The Book of Jasher as
Noah's wife. There is also other evidence, too, with the name of Cain being mentioned post-Flood via the
name of a tribe of people known as the Kenites. In the Hebrew language their name is a derivation of Cain.
In the Hebrew, it's pronounced 'qey-niy' or 'kay-nee' and Cain is pronounced 'qayin' or 'kay-yin' so we can
see there is a definite connection.
We then have the name Canaan which is pronounced 'ken-na'an' or 'Ken-ah-an'. So as we can plainly see
all these people are related and originate from Cain.
This means that Cain's race did not die out with
The Flood.

Why the Curse on Canaan?

Noah's wife is only referred to as "Mrs Noah" (my terminology), but who was she? In order for the line of Cain
to bridge the flood one of the eight redeemed survivors that entered the ark had to be a descendant of Cain.
A crucial point we also need to understand is that at this point in mankind's history the tribal,
clannish or better, the seed line is carried by the male side and it does not change to the female
side until Sarah, Abraham's first wife.
So this means that the Adam/Sethitic line or the line of man is carried by Noah and his three sons. This, in
turn, means that Noah's daughters in law could also have been descendants of Cain, but we are not told.
However, because the male side, at this juncture, carries the dynastic line, the genetic origins of these
women are of no significance. The Sethitic line is carried by all three sons for they were all sons of Adam via
Seth. So this brings us back to the racial identity of Mrs Noah, for it is she who is the link pin to this
fascinating story. Please note, too, for this is important; all the offspring of Noah's three sons will carry the
Sethitic line, but with one exception and I will return to this issue later in the article.
There is a woman mentioned in Genesis 4:22 by the name of Naamah who was the sister of Tubal-Cain so
she was, most definitely, a descendant of Cain. The thing is, was she Noah's wife? The answer, and
suspiciously so once more, cannot be found in the King James Bible so we have no option but to look
elsewhere for the evidence. Having looked elsewhere, what do you think we will find? Answer: Yes, Naamah
was Noah's wife according to the Midrash Genesis Rabbah which are ancient Judaic texts and from the
Wikipedia we get:
"Genesis Rabba Bereshith Rabba is a religious text from Judaism's classical period. It is a midrash (Hebrew
for 'an interpretation') comprising a collection of ancient rabbinical homiletical interpretations of the book of
Genesis (Bereshith in Hebrew)."
From another source we have verses 15-16 in chapter five of the Book of Jasher, which reads as follows:
15 And thou shalt raise up seed, and thy children with thee, in the midst of the earth; and Noah went and
took a wife, and he chose Naamah the daughter of Enoch, and she was five hundred and eighty years old.
16 And Noah was four hundred and ninety-eight years old, when he took Naamah for a wife.
The Book of Jasher is referred to as the 'lost' Book of Jasher and in modern terms dates from a translation
of 1887.
Interestingly, this book gets mentioned twice in the Holy Scriptures, so from this
evidence alone we can assume that it has more than some validity
and here are the Scriptures for
your information:
Josh 10:13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon
their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher?
2 Sam 1:18 (Also he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow: behold, it is written in the
book of Jasher.)
Here we can plainly see that the Book of Jasher is referred to as a reference of some importance and used
as proof text or back-up evidence for the two historical events mentioned. It is being used as a source of
validation, so we cannot just sweep it aside as a book of myths and/or fallacious additional material.
OK, so with this proof and/or evidence in mind we will return to the Holy Scriptures where we read the
account of Ham's wickedness or his wicked sin perpetrated upon his father, Noah. Here again the King
James Bible leaves much to be desired in its recording of this crucial event in mankind's history. In effect it's
another of those dumbed down stories, like the fall in the Garden of Eden account. Both these accounts
were written so as to mislead by not revealing the Truth of these sordid and evil events.
Make no mistake; this solitary evil act by Ham would affect the outcome of this world's history, for it was,
without doubt, the Devil's handiwork through Cain's descendant, Naamah. So without further ado let's copy
the relevant Holy Scriptures here so that we can analyse them in detail:
Gen 9:18-27 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham
is the father of Canaan.
19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth
overspread. 20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of  the
wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the
nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and
laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their
faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. 24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and
knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants
shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his
servant. 27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his
Now the first thing that becomes apparent in this short passage of Holy Scripture is the mentioning of Ham
being Canaan's father and it's mentioned twice, why? Why not reveal Ham's other sons and why not refer to
Shem's sons as well as Japheth's sons? What is so special about this Canaan that he should be
mentioned twice whilst all the other grandchildren of Noah are ignored completely; what's it all about? Quite  
simply, Canaan is a very different 'grandchild' altogether and not a grandchild at all in the ordinary sense.

Before I move on I wish to counter some negative stuff that some commentators have written about Noah
and his drunkenness in this story. Let me tell you; their attitude is extremely judgmental with some of them
even suggesting that Noah had become an alcoholic and that his drunkenness was a regular occurrence.
This is pure guess-work on their part and, at best, blasphemous arrogant conjecture. After the flood Noah
became a husbandman, and, amongst other husbandry, had planted a vineyard and was no doubt
celebrating the fruits of his labors. All this story line is telling us is that he obviously ended up drinking too
much, but this is no reason to label the great man an alcoholic; a man who found grace in the Lord's sight.
None-the-more-for-that, whilst intoxicated, something happens to Noah and this 'happening' is so serious  
that it results in Ham's son, Canaan, being cursed. This is no light matter when we consider that patriarchs
usually like to bless their offspring, not curse them. (Please read the account of Jacob/Israel blessing his two
grandsons, Ephraim and Manasseh, in Genesis 48)
This event was tragic and traumatic for all concerned, including Shem and Japheth who had to literally cover
their 'father's nakedness'. Now this occurrence leaves us with more questions. For instance, what was Ham
trying to achieve here by involving his brothers? Did he boast about what he had done? Was this event
symbolic of Adam and Eve's aprons in the Garden? Was he trying to hide his guilt? Was he attempting a
'cover-up', (just as our corrupt rotten politicians do today) hoping that Noah would not find out? Notice, too,
that it needs both his brothers to carry the covering garment, so we're not talking about a flimsy single sheet
that we would use today to cover one of our modern beds, this was a very wide garment indeed and most
likely wide enough to cover two people, and herein lies the first evidence that we are not just dealing with
Ham seeing his father's nudity.
Here again we have a parallel with the Garden of Eden account, for the punishment does not fit the crime if
we take it as it reads. Once again we are dealing with symbolism or turns of phrase that have a deeper or
stronger meaning. In this story we are having to focus on the term "uncovered his father's nakedness" and
what it really means, just as we had to take another look at what the Biblical rendering was alluding to when it
said that Eve "took of the 'fruit' and did eat". So what was the real meaning of Ham "uncovering his father's
nakedness?" Fortunately, we don't have look outside the Holy Scriptures for the answer of what this phrase
means, for it is found within the pages of Leviticus:
Lev 18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
Lev 20:11 And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness: both of them
shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
When a man forms a permanent union with a woman they become one flesh in God's sight and the Holy
Scriptures from Leviticus cement this view. In the New Testament the Lord Jesus Christ confirms this:
Matt 19:5-6 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and
they twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath
joined together, let not man put asunder.

So here we can see
the seriousness of Ham's sin, for he did put asunder the union between his
father and his mother. He saw his father's nakedness by lying with and having incestuous sexual
relations with his mother and thereby made her pregnant with Canaan.
This is the only explanation there can be for the singling out of Canaan as the recipient of the curse and not
Ham's other sons. By doing this, Noah not only punished his son, but he punished his wife too, for no mother
wishes to see harm come to her children. Now we know why the covering garment needed two men to carry
it, for it most likely covered their mother's nakedness as well as their father's - if only symbolically and
nothing else. It is also worth mentioning that Noah never knew his wife sexually again after this event.
Now what of the nature of this curse, for it clearly states that Canaan's descendants would be slaves to
Shem's descendants and slaves to Japheth's descendants, and, even worse, slaves of slaves. They would
also feature big time in the future when Joshua led the Israelites into the land of Canaan and more or less
killed them all apart from a few whom they took as slaves:

Josh 16:10 And they drave not out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer: but the Canaanites dwell among the
Ephraimites unto this day, and serve under tribute.
"The Ephraimites" in this verse represents the ten tribes of Israel, not just the tribe of Ephraim alone. Joshua
was an Ephraimite. Also, the use of the word Ephraimites is used to differentiate between them and the
twelve tribes which would have included Judah and Levi. In particular, though, for us in this latter day age it
refers to England, her Commonwealth and Anglo-Saxon peoples of the USA where the slavery of Canaanites
(black people) was at its greatest during the time period from the 16th to the 20th centuries - segregation
was a type of slavery or a system where Canaanites were serving under tribute. How do we know that the
Canaanites were black people?
Easy, Ham in the Egyptian language means 'black' and Cush, one of Ham's other sons, also means 'black' in
the Hebrew language.
Now were all Canaanites black; obviously not, because the Romans were descended from Canaan, as were
the Egyptians (modern Spaniards or Hispanics) who were brown rather that black? We then have the
Babylonians (modern Italians) who are also brown and, notice; all these peoples, predominantly, have black
Then, finally, we have the Canaanite Jews who originate from a forbidden and unholy union between the
patriarch Judah and a Canaanitess named Shuah as recorded in Genesis 38. Again, black hair
predominates amongst Canaanite Jews or those of the dispersion. Have you ever noticed how the Orthodox
Jews i.e. Canaanite Jews always wear black - black suits, black coats and black Homburg hats - just a

OK, to round off, I will return to the point I made earlier about Noah's sons and grandsons all being of the
Sethitic line with one exception and of course that one exception was Canaan who carried Cain's blood
through the evil sin of his parents - Ham and his Cainite mother, Naamah. The Lord then had to curse
Canaan through Noah just as he had to curse all of mankind through Adam and Eve's sin by throwing them
out of the Garden of Eden. Bad blood has to carry a curse, for it cannot find favour in the Father's sight
unless it's redeemed by the Lord's blood through His death and resurrection.
Notice the Tree trunk on this Tarot card.
Is that Adam and Eve "chained" to
choosing evil???
In Latin, the words for 'apple' ("mālum") and for 'evil' ("mălum") are nearly identical. This
may also have influenced the apple's becoming interpreted as the biblical 'forbidden fruit'
in the commonly used Latin translation called "Vulgate". The larynx in the human throat
has been called Adam's apple because of the folk tale that the bulge was caused by the
forbidden fruit sticking in the throat of Adam. The apple as symbol of sexual seduction has
sometimes been used to imply sexuality between men...

The number five is important in the world of apples, and not just because apple is a five-
letter word: Apple blossoms typically form in clusters of five … an apple blossom has five
petals … Red Delicious apples usually have five bumps (lobes) on the base of the apple
… The "star" you see when you cut an apple in half is due to the fruit's five seed cavities.
Each cavity has the potential for 2 seeds, thus 10 seeds per apple are the norm.

Every 8 years the positions of Venus, Earth and the Sun all full into a straight line. Mark
each of these lines and they create a wonderful pentagonal flower pattern in the solar
system that redraws itself again and again.

the Apple Seed collection symbolizes the union
between woman and man, spiritual and material;
heaven and earth. The five-rayed star represents
the balance and harmony of the five senses as
well as the elements: earth, air, fire, water and
When you slice an apple into two halves, the apple seed in the core appears as a
five-pointed star. The five-pointed star is the manifestation of light; the mystic center
and someone blazing like the light itself.
Appleseed is the shape of the path that Venus star follows in the sky over 40 years.
Venus, the jewel of the sky, is known as the morning and evening star because it
shines the brightest.

Venus Spins the Opposite Way from the Other Planets.
It was believed in those days that the World was made of five elements; those elements
were; Earth, Air, Fire and Water. The fifth element that bound them all together was Spirit.
These elements were usually represented by a Pentacle, a five pointed star. If you take
an Apple and place it on its side and instead of cutting it from stem to flower, cut it through
the equator. You will see that in the center of an apple is a Pentacle. Inside the Pentacle
lie the Apple seeds so the pentacle holds the seeds of life. If anyone would eat the Apple
seeds they would detect a somewhat bitter taste. This is because Apple seeds contain
cyanide. A very small dose and quite harmless but a large enough quantity could be
lethal. So the Apple contains a Pentacle with the seeds of Life and Death.
earth venus and the sun align 5 times over an 8 year cycle

In ancient times, this orbital pentagram of Venus was very well known
and deeply revered. It was called the Morning Star, the Evening Star,
the Babylonian Ishtar, the Star of Bethlehem and the Light Bringer
(Lucifer in Latin). Gnostic followers of this star believed it brought
enlightenment and wisdom to all those who studied it.
    The Old Testament has
    39 books total


The next 6 books trace the time
from Samuel to the Captivity
The Next 3 books deal with
Israel's Restoration.





Apple seeds have cyanide in them.
PSSSST...Check out Adam's FIRST wife, Lillith HERE
“We can gain the knowledge of evil by directly
participating in it or we can believe God and avoid
the things He has said are bad for us.” http: